Barstool Economics and the Income Tax Debate

We are often asked about “What’s going to happen tax wise and what does it mean?”   The issue of higher taxes for the wealthy is currently dominating the media and election debates. The following is an interesting look at this issue attributed to David R. Kamerschen, PhD, Professor of Economics, University of Georgia.   The following barstool economics analogy is as relevant today as it was in 2008 when it first appeared in the popular media and classrooms.

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100.  If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing. The fifth would pay $1. The sixth would pay $3. The seventh would pay $7. The eighth would pay $12. The ninth would pay $18. The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that’s what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve.  “Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20” so drinks for the ten now cost just $80.  The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. . They would still drink for free. . . But what about the other six men, the paying customers, how could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his ‘fair share?’. . . They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. . .  But if they subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.  And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings). The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings). The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings). The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).  The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings). The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. . . And the first four continued to drink for free. . . But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.  “I only got a dollar out of the $20,”declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,” but he got $10!” “Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man.  “I only saved a dollar, too.  It’s unfair that he got ten times more than I!” “That’s true!!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get $10 back when I got only two?  The wealthy get all the breaks!” “Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison.  “We didn’t get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!”  The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important.  They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!  And that, ladies and gentlemen, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works.  The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction.  Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore.  In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.  Taxes are a question of behavior economics – once one understands that they can gain a clearer picture of any current or pending legislation and what it means for the economy. There must be tax revenues for our government to operate. The question is what the source of taxes and levels of participation should be. This will be an interesting and ongoing debate. We hope that this helps give a better understanding of the issue and as always are happy to discuss this with you.

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Randy Carver and not necessarily those of Raymond James. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse the opinions or services of David R. Kamerschen or the University of Georgia. You should discuss any tax matters with the appropriate professional.